Aye: 2 - Elenbaas and Stremler
Nay: 5 - Galloway, Rienstra, Scanlon, Boyle, and Buchanan
Councilmembers discussed the main motion to adopt this ordinance and the
following additional people also spoke and answered questions:
·
·
Kayla Schott-Bresler, Executive's Office
Satpal Sidhu, County Executive
They discussed that the State law already gives direction on how the funds
can be spent so the County cannot just spend it on anything for the General
Fund, that being too prescriptive with the money might hinder their ability
to execute the criminal justice facility project in a manner in which the
community expects them to, that the revenue would go into a special
criminal justice sales tax fund either way (with this ordinance or with the
executive’s), that the executive’s version gives the Council the most
flexibility down the road to direct the funds, that anytime funds are moved
in or out of a special fund it comes to Council, importance of the voice of
the people and that they can place an advisory vote before them, the legal
guidance regarding whether putting the tax on the ballot was a tool the
Legislature gave them, the urgency of this measure and that certainty
afforded by adopting the tax can help them build stability into the County’s
budget, and that the people seem to want to know how the money will be
spent.
Donnell Tanksley, Sheriff, spoke about the grant program also associated
with this State law. He spoke about how much of that they applied for and
the purposes for which it would be used, including unfreezing Sheriff’s
Department positions, assisting with the Law Enforcement Assisted
Diversion (LEAD) program, assisting with ongoing training, and building a
wellness infrastructure. They applied for a total of $624,000.
Scanlon stated that other cities and counties have already adopted this tax
according to State law and without a vote of the people, and he spoke in
favor of the ordinance and why it has specifications for how the money
should be used.
Elenbaas stated another concern he has is that Lynden and Bellingham have
already passed this tax and now we are going to double up on it. He would
prefer to ask permission from the voters.
Buchanan's motion that the Ordinance Requiring a Public Hearing be
ADOPTED carried by the following vote:
5 - Boyle, Buchanan, Galloway, Rienstra, and Scanlon
2 - Elenbaas, and Stremler
Aye:
Nay: