Whatcom County  
Council Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee  
COUNTY COURTHOUSE  
311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105  
Bellingham, WA 98225-4038  
(360) 778-5010  
Committee Minutes - Final  
Tuesday, June 23, 2026  
1 PM  
Hybrid Meeting - Council Chambers  
HYBRID MEETING - ADJOURNS BY 2:00 P.M. (PARTICIPATE IN-PERSON, SEE  
CALL 360.778.5010)  
COUNCILMEMBERS  
Elizabeth Boyle  
Barry Buchanan  
Ben Elenbaas  
Kaylee Galloway  
Jessica Rienstra  
Jon Scanlon  
Mark Stremler  
CLERK OF THE COUNCIL  
Cathy Halka, AICP, CMC  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
Committee Chair Barry Buchanan called the meeting to order at 1:05 p.m.  
in a hybrid meeting.  
7 -  
Present:  
Elizabeth Boyle, Barry Buchanan, Ben Elenbaas, Kaylee Galloway, Jessica  
Rienstra, Jon Scanlon, and Mark Stremler  
Announcements  
Special Presentation  
Presentation by STV on Justice Project programming results  
1.  
Kayla Schott-Bresler, Executive's Office, introduced the presentation. She  
stated they are going to be talking today about the jail facility and that the  
programming work for the Behavioral Care Center (BCC) is ongoing and  
will be forthcoming after this work concludes and they get through the next  
steps.  
Adam Johnson, STV Project Manager, read from a presentation (on file).  
He reviewed the programming process timeline and stated August is when  
they will have the final report for the validation period. He presented the  
program which started with an initial base of 227,000 square feet, and then  
was realigned to the budget ($205 million) and reduced down to 150,000  
square feet. He spoke about the reduced scope and how it compares to the  
current facilities (the downtown jail and the work center), that the operating  
capacity should be greater in the new facility because of more flexibility  
with the spaces, features of the facility and rationale behind how it was  
designed, and that programming numbers and design may change as they  
start to put things on paper.  
Hannah Fisk, Health and Community Services Special Projects Manager,  
spoke about the behavioral health design and features they were able to  
retain through the programming process.  
Johnson spoke about how needs were reduced from every aspect of the base  
program in order to align with the budget cap, the features that were not  
retained (including the reentry/Rapid Resource Center and some of the  
warehouse/commissary space), and what they will do as they finish the  
validation phase.  
Schott-Bresler stated the recommendation coming out of the Finance and  
Facilities Advisory Board was to accept the program as presented by the  
project team. They are looking for Council review and acceptance by the  
August recess.  
Councilmembers discussed the presentation with the presenters and other  
speakers.  
Buchanan stated the Rapid Resource Center is a disappointment and the  
second courtroom is a big disappointment. When he was working with  
stakeholders, that was a through-line with all the stakeholders because it  
does not just help one component of the system, it helps the entire system.  
He is hoping they can figure out how they can get things onto the buyback  
list.  
Satpal Sidhu, County Executive, stated the Rapid Resource facility is not  
part of the jail but is actually a separate place. The footprint at the Hannegan  
site is much bigger so a lot of things are possible. One thought is that it can  
be added any time. The courtroom is different, however, because it is part  
of the jail. They are aware of these needs being very important and will keep  
the Council informed as things develop by August or September.  
Schott-Bresler answered what the current thinking is about the jail work  
center and if that building could be used for something out-of-custody like  
the reentry program or other services. She stated they have not concluded  
discussions about what will happen to the work center in the future. She  
spoke about prioritizing buy-backs and that some, such as a second  
courtroom, are more difficult and expensive to achieve than others.  
Scanlon stated Judge Freeman brought up the second courtroom as a  
concern, but he would also like to hear from the criminal justice side about  
how it might impact their operations. He asked if there is any potential for  
state funding for that courtroom space.  
Schott-Bresler stated they have not been overly optimistic about state  
funding for parts of the facility that would be the jail facility and have  
tended to focus their state legislative asks on things connected to behavioral  
health services.  
Caleb Erickson, Sheriff's Office, answered if the detox medical unit  
includes DUI, and stated it is intended to give medical care for people who  
are detoxing and other critical medical needs and is not purpose-built for  
DUI, although some people who are in custody for DUI may have a  
crossover and may have a need that could be met in that space.  
Johnson answered when they will start to see the programming and design  
for the Behavioral Care Center (since the decisions that will be made about  
debt authorization include both facilities), and stated they will be at the  
same point they will be with the jail in July or August by November or  
December for the BCC.  
Erickson answered if specialized units (beyond just male and female) are  
still in the conversation, and stated they tried to make the space as flexible  
as possible.  
Fisk answered if a sobering unit would be included in the 23-hour crisis  
facility and she spoke about reclining sobering beds and stated it is not out  
of the realm of options.  
Councilmembers and the speakers discussed sharing the list of potential  
buy-backs with Council, if the Rapid Resource Center will continue to be  
planned and designed so that it would be shovel-ready if a state legislative  
appropriation is approved, the lack of the second courtroom in this  
programming and that they are prioritizing some of the life safety and  
behavioral health beds over that, if the design of the building would allow  
them to add another courtroom somewhere adjacent where it would flow,  
what space or allocation of resources might be available in the absence of  
the reentry piece and where reentry support might happen within the jail  
while someone is in custody, if concerns about space for victims and  
people impacted by crime are being considered in the design of the court  
facilities in the jail, if there is a path (with compromises) for having two  
courtrooms, the process for Council to reach a consensus between now and  
August, that the team is planning to get the operational cost information to  
Council in July and to deliver the prosecutorial diversion addendum with  
some analysis soon, and that the program they saw today is very unlikely to  
significantly change between now and August.  
Schott-Bresler stated they would be looking for a motion to accept the  
project team's recommendation and program before the August recess to  
keep the timeline moving forward.  
Buchanan stated he is interested in seeing the operational cost data before  
he moves ahead because he thinks it is so important for this whole program.  
This agenda item was PRESENTED AND DISCUSSED.  
Items Added by Revision  
There were no agenda items added by revision.  
Other Business  
Adjournment  
There was no other business.  
The meeting adjourned at 1:50 p.m.  
ATTEST:  
WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL  
WHATCOM COUNTY, WA  
Barry Buchanan-via email 6/29/2026  
___________________________  
Barry Buchanan, Committee Chair  
______________________________  
Cathy Halka, Council Clerk  
Meeting Minutes prepared by Kristi Felbinger  
SIGNED COPY ON FILE