Whatcom County  
Council Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee  
COUNTY COURTHOUSE  
311 Grand Avenue, Ste #105  
Bellingham, WA 98225-4038  
(360) 778-5010  
Committee Minutes - Final  
Tuesday, March 10, 2026  
9:35 AM  
Hybrid Meeting - Council Chambers  
HYBRID MEETING - MAY BEGIN EARLY/LATE - ADJOURNS BY 10:55 A.M.  
(PARTICIPATE IN-PERSON, SEE REMOTE JOIN INSTRUCTIONS AT  
COUNCILMEMBERS  
Elizabeth Boyle  
Barry Buchanan  
Ben Elenbaas  
Kaylee Galloway  
Jessica Rienstra  
Jon Scanlon  
Mark Stremler  
CLERK OF THE COUNCIL  
Cathy Halka, AICP, CMC  
Call To Order  
Roll Call  
Committee Chair Barry Buchanan called the meeting to order at 9:56 a.m.  
in a hybrid meeting.  
7 -  
Present:  
Elizabeth Boyle, Barry Buchanan, Ben Elenbaas, Kaylee Galloway, Jessica  
Rienstra, Jon Scanlon, and Mark Stremler  
Announcements  
Special Presentation  
Report from District Court Probation  
1.  
Jake Wiebusch, District Court Administrator, read from a presentation (on  
file) about District Court Probation. He spoke about what they do and some  
of the services they provide, probation staff and their specialized caseloads,  
and programs they run at no additional expense to clients to fill the gap  
between their core services and outside referred treatment providers. He  
answered whether they see programs other counties are doing to reduce and  
prevent incarceration that they would like Whatcom County to take on, and  
stated there is a significant need for mental health evaluations. He answered  
where Whatcom County lands as far as caseloads and stated they are a little  
above the national standards.  
This agenda item was REPORTED.  
Committee Discussion  
Discussion of Justice Project finances and interlocal agreement  
1.  
Jed Holmes, Executive's Office, read from a presentation (on file) about the  
current interlocal agreement with the cities and revenue for the Justice  
Project, what the sales tax is bringing in, what levers or parameters can be  
adjusted to potentially increase the amount of funds available for capital  
construction, and that conversations are underway with the City of  
Bellingham and the small cities to consider an update of the existing  
interlocal.  
Kayla Schott-Bresler, Executive's Office, stated they do not need a decision  
until the end of April but would like the Council to provide some direction  
to the project team and create an interim decision point around the budget.  
She answered what additional information Council will get before they have  
to make that budgetary decision (besides a behavioral health study that will  
be done in the next few weeks), and stated the project team is working on  
that behavioral health analysis and there will be a refined jail capacity  
analysis (which will help inform what types of healthcare beds are needed in  
the facility and other classification considerations), updated scenarios that  
would act as a recommendation for priorities the project team would like to  
see, and operational cost modeling (which depends on all the other  
information to inform that).  
She answered if the project team is looking at ways to reduce costs of  
construction in materials or construction methods, and stated they are, but  
it is too early to determine some things without a design.  
Scott Korthuis, Lynden City Mayor, was invited to speak and stated he has  
been working on a letter with the City of Bellingham and small cities to  
send to the Council about concerns the cities might have as they move  
forward, and criteria (including enough capacity to not have booking  
restrictions) they would ask for if they commit to more years. They also  
recognize that we need a facility that encourages diversion rather than  
incarceration, and part of that is the behavioral health center. They want to  
build a jail that is efficient and designed to minimize staff and maximize  
efficiency of the labor force that we have. They recognize that they will  
likely need to negotiate on changes to the jail use agreement. The Finance  
Advisory Board needs to get a number to the County first and give that to  
the design team. Every two months they are losing $1.5 million in buying  
power so they need to keep this moving quickly. He answered if the small  
cities have a mechanism in mind to reinforce their ask for no booking  
restrictions. He stated one of the hopes is that they will get either State or  
Federal money to pay for the behavioral care center. Then, if additional cash  
is opened up, the first thing they have to commit to is capacity. He spoke  
about getting costs from the design team for adding beds as well.  
Galloway spoke about what information she needs in order to set a budget  
cap, including knowing that all the cities are on board, an update to the  
interlocal, modest sales tax growth projections, and pending information on  
potential cost savings. She stated whatever they set their cap at, it needs to  
be within their financial means and needs to include the construction of a  
behavioral care center in conjunction. She stated they also need to consider  
demolition of the existing facility and short-term utilization of the work  
center to build capacity if capacity is truly needed. She spoke about figuring  
out the cap and then how they would spend that, and stated it is really  
important that they leverage and prioritize the use of other County funds to  
meet the commitment to services.  
Councilmembers and the speakers discussed that the cities would be in  
favor of more beds to address capacity needs and that there will need to be  
compromise because of financial limitations, how they know what an  
adequately sized jail looks like to avoid booking restrictions and that  
recommendations should come through the jail capacity analysis, that the  
IPRTF needs to see data on how existing diversion programs are working so  
they can make educated decisions on which to fund to have less recidivism,  
that not enough detail about specialized housing in the original jail capacity  
analysis is what prompted the need for another one, what would be different  
with different numbers of beds, and the belief that without the  
accountability of a jail, it will not matter how much money they spend on  
everything else.  
Korthuis answered why he believes the cities want a right-sized jail.  
Buchanan stated he thinks they need to look at the work center as a  
temporary resource to build capacity.  
Korthuis stated he is glad to hear them vocalizing to keep the work center as  
a possibility and he spoke about his comfort level with the number of beds  
in the jail, with 480 being his lowest.  
Councilmembers and the speakers discussed also right-sizing behavioral  
care, that because of its high cost per day, it really has to work, that the  
maximum debt scenario brings down the dollar amount available for  
community-based services, if the Sheriff’s Office capacity review is taking  
into account provision of services in the capacity analysis or if its  
projections are assuming our patterns just continue, that data shows that  
community and behavioral health services do decrease recidivism and the  
use of the jail, that they should use that information in deciding how much  
money they will put forward, the balance between accountability and giving  
pre-trial people due process, and whether they should seek other funding  
for the behavioral health side.  
This agenda item was DISCUSSED.  
Items Added by Revision  
There were no agenda items added by revision.  
Other Business  
Adjournment  
There was no other business.  
The meeting adjourned at 11:02 a.m.  
ATTEST:  
WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL  
WHATCOM COUNTY, WA  
Barry Buchanan-via email 3/17/2026  
___________________________  
Barry Buchanan, Committee Chair  
______________________________  
Cathy Halka, Council Clerk  
Meeting Minutes prepared by Kristi Felbinger  
SIGNED COPY ON FILE